Compare · Datadog
Control the data plane—or rent a metered one
The decisive difference is who owns storage and how cost grows. MoleSignal turns observability into infrastructure you control; Datadog attaches separate meters to hosts, intake, indexing, retention, and products.
| Decision point | MoleSignal | Datadog |
|---|
| Deployment | Self-hosted standalone or multi-role deployment; Kubernetes manifests are available. | Managed Datadog service with agents or OpenTelemetry components forwarding telemetry to a Datadog site. |
|---|
| Commercial model | Apache 2.0 core with no software license fee; you pay for your infrastructure and optional support. | Separate product meters include per-host and usage-based pricing; exact rates depend on product, retention, and commitment. |
|---|
| Signals | Logs, metrics, traces, and continuous profiles, plus dashboards and three alert rule kinds. | A broad platform spanning infrastructure, APM, logs, profiling, digital experience, security, service management, and more. |
|---|
| Investigation context | Logs, metrics, and traces share tenant, time, object-storage, and query context; profiles join the same investigation plane. | Datadog documents correlation across traces, metrics, logs, processes, network data, and other products. |
|---|
| Collection | OpenTelemetry-native OTLP plus Prometheus remote_write, Loki, Elasticsearch bulk, and other compatible inputs. | Datadog Agent and a large integration catalog, with documented OpenTelemetry support. |
|---|
| Data boundary | Telemetry stays inside infrastructure, Postgres, and object storage you control. | Telemetry is stored and processed in Datadog’s managed service rather than your infrastructure. |
|---|